I understand Colin's view point entirely and have dived myself, on occassion, to over 100m with very little bail-out - usually due circumtances beyond my control - with risks that I am prepared to accept as I do the pre-check dive and only on rare occassions.
I have dived, sober-talked and pub-talked with a diver who had to bail out from 130m (his RMV went through the roof, understandably).
I have also been on a boat in the UK when one of the 'best of the best' divers had the most uncomfortable experiences of his life on CCR and took well over an hour to get over it sitting on the boat afterwards (sorry, I can not go into this more here).
My point is, and also my concern is, that many divers do not seem to be able to make logical, independent and thorough risk assessments of the factors involved and the what-if's that might happen, say in the event of bailing-out. Risk assessment requires training, in my view - it is not a natural instinct.
How many of us have completed diver training, at a reasonable high level, where the instructor's 'what-if' tips amount to a couple of anecdotes that happened to him or a mate of his???
What is also important is that you are aware of the residual risks once you make your decisions, along with the myriad of unknowns and permutations of unknowns that may befall you. These residual risks - ie. nagging doubts / the voices in the head! - often decide your approach to riskier sports. Mitigation in deep (sea) diving can come in the form of buddies, further training, agreed drop systems, bail-out cylinders, surface support, returning to shot line/tagging systems, staged cylinders, etc, etc.
Ref. deep SEA diving above: sorry Artur, I know nothing about cave diving - just enough to keep well clear of it!!!